Cycling should be a safe transportation option for Americans. Yet, data tells a different story: the United States has one of the highest cyclist fatality rates among developed nations. Poor infrastructure, complicated laws, and cultural attitudes create hazardous conditions for people who choose to travel on two wheels.
This article examines why most American states remain hostile environments for cyclists and what legal recourse exists for those injured on our roads. By understanding these challenges, we can work toward creating safer streets for everyone.
The State of Cycling Safety in America
The statistics paint a grim picture. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), there were 1,005 cyclist deaths in the United States in 2022. Thousands more suffer serious injuries, from broken bones to traumatic brain injuries and spinal cord damage.
When we compare these numbers to countries with robust cycling infrastructure like the Netherlands, Denmark, or Germany, the contrast becomes stark. American cyclists face a fatality rate 3–5 times higher than their European counterparts.
What makes American streets so dangerous? The answer involves multiple interconnected factors:
Car-Centric Infrastructure Design
American roads were built for cars, not people. This fundamental design philosophy creates inherent dangers for anyone not protected by two tons of metal.
Wide Roads That Encourage Speed
Many American roads feature multiple wide lanes that subtly encourage drivers to accelerate. Research shows that drivers naturally adjust their speed to match the road design. Wider roads signal to drivers that they can — and should — drive faster. This creates dangerous conditions for cyclists who must share this space.
Lack of Protected Bike Lanes
The gold standard for cyclist safety is protected bike lanes — pathways separated from vehicle traffic by physical barriers. Yet fewer than 1% of American roads include this feature. Instead, cyclists must either:
- Share lanes with fast-moving vehicles
- Use painted bike lanes that provide no physical protection
- Ride on sidewalks (which is illegal in many jurisdictions and creates conflicts with pedestrians).
Dangerous Intersections
Most cycling accidents occur at intersections, where multiple traffic flows converge. American intersection design often fails to account for cyclist safety, with problems including:
- Limited visibility for all road users
- Complicated turning patterns
- Signal timing that prioritizes vehicle throughput over safety
- Lack of dedicated cyclist signals or turning areas.
Inadequate Legal Protections
Beyond physical infrastructure, American legal systems often fail to protect cyclists adequately. Many states lack robust “vulnerable road user” laws that would impose meaningful penalties on drivers who harm cyclists. Where such laws exist, they frequently suffer from minimal enforcement and low penalties that don’t deter dangerous driving.
Several states — including Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia — follow the harsh doctrine of contributory negligence. This prevents injured cyclists from recovering damages if they were even 1% at fault for an accident, denying compensation to cyclists who made minor mistakes.
Insurance complications further burden injured cyclists. Medical bills often exceed the minimum liability coverage many drivers carry, while no-fault insurance states typically have low personal injury protection limits. In some states, uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage doesn’t extend to cyclists, leaving victims with limited options for recovery.
Cultural Attitudes and Lack of Education
Beyond physical and legal structures, American culture often displays active hostility toward cyclists.
The “Roads Are for Cars” Mentality
Many Americans believe roads exist primarily or exclusively for motor vehicles. This attitude manifests in:
- Aggressive driving around cyclists
- Deliberate harassment (honking, shouting, close passing)
- Political resistance to cycling infrastructure investments
- Social media groups dedicated to complaining about “entitled cyclists.”
Driver Education Gaps
Most American driver education programs dedicate minimal time to teaching proper interaction with cyclists. This creates dangerous situations where drivers:
- Don’t know proper passing distance (should be at least 3 feet in most states)
- Fail to check for cyclists before opening car doors (“dooring”)
- Make right turns without checking for cyclists in bike lanes
- Misunderstand cyclists’ legal right to use the full lane when necessary.
Cyclist Blame in Media Coverage
Media coverage of cycling accidents often displays subtle or overt bias against cyclists. News reports frequently:
- Focus on whether the cyclist wore a helmet, even in accidents where head protection was irrelevant
- Use passive voice to describe driver actions (“a cyclist was struck” rather than “a driver hit a cyclist”)
- Emphasize cyclist behavior while downplaying driver responsibility
- Frame accidents as inevitable rather than preventable.
This coverage shapes public perception and can influence how police, insurance adjusters, and juries view cycling accident cases.
Economic and Political Forces
Powerful economic interests often align against cycling safety improvements.
Auto Industry Influence
The automotive industry spends millions annually on lobbying efforts that often oppose the following measures:
- Reduced speed limits
- Road diets (lane reductions to slow traffic)
- Funding shifts from highway expansion to cycling infrastructure
- Stronger distracted driving laws.
Municipal Budget Constraints
Many local governments face tight budgets and must make difficult choices about infrastructure spending. Without dedicated funding sources, cycling improvements often fall to the bottom of priority lists. This creates situations where:
- Bike lanes end abruptly at municipal boundaries
- Maintenance of existing cycling infrastructure receives inadequate funding
- Safety improvements get implemented piecemeal rather than systematically
- Wealthy areas receive better cycling infrastructure than lower-income neighborhoods.
Legal Remedies for Injured Cyclists
Despite these challenges, injured cyclists do have legal options.
Personal Injury Lawsuits
When a driver’s negligence causes a cycling accident, the injured cyclist can file a lawsuit seeking damages for:
- Medical expenses (past and future)
- Lost wages and diminished earning capacity
- Pain and suffering
- Emotional distress
- Property damage.
These cases require proving four elements: duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Successful cases often depend on thorough investigation, expert testimony, and compelling presentation of evidence.
Product Liability Claims
Sometimes cycling accidents result from defective equipment or road design. In these cases, injured cyclists may have claims against:
- Bicycle or component manufacturers
- Helmet manufacturers
- Government entities responsible for road maintenance
- Construction companies that created hazardous conditions.
These claims face additional hurdles, including governmental immunity defenses and complex technical evidence requirements.
Insurance Claims
Most cycling accident cases resolve through insurance claims rather than trials. Cyclists should understand the coverage available through:
- The at-fault driver’s liability insurance
- Their own uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage
- Personal health insurance
- Homeowner’s or renter’s insurance (which sometimes covers cycling accidents).
Progress and Potential Solutions
Despite the challenges, some American cities and states have made significant progress in improving cyclist safety:
Protected Bike Lane Networks
Cities like New York, Chicago, and Portland have invested in connected networks of protected bike lanes. These projects have demonstrated that with proper infrastructure, cycling rates increase while accidents decrease.
Complete Streets Policies
More than 1,600 Complete Streets policies have been adopted nationwide, requiring road designers to consider all users — and not just drivers — when building or upgrading infrastructure. These policies, when properly implemented, create safer conditions for cyclists.
Vision Zero Initiatives
Dozens of American cities have adopted Vision Zero — a commitment to eliminating traffic fatalities through systematic safety improvements. While results have been mixed, these programs represent an important shift toward prioritizing safety over speed.
Conclusion
American streets remain dangerous for cyclists because of a complex mix of infrastructure deficiencies, legal gaps, cultural attitudes, and economic forces. Yet the situation isn’t hopeless. Through targeted legal reform, infrastructure investment, education campaigns, and cultural shifts, we can create a country where cycling is both safe and commonplace.
Must-read Articles:
